Page 6 - Education Change and Economic Development: The Case of Singapore Dr. Goh Chor Boon National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University
P. 6

66      ᐿ࿲ၾආӉj઺ԃٙɢඎ





                  and capitalised on the country’s comparatively low-cost and disciplined labour

                  force.
                       Lee and his chief economic wizard, Goh Keng Swee, then Deputy Prime
                  Minister had the foresight of attracting foreign multinationals (MNCs) to set

                  up shops in Singapore. The MNCs were seen as critical channels through
                  which Singapore could acquire the latest in managerial and technological
                  knowledge. Foreign technology became an effective means to overcome

                  domestic limitations, such as the lack of an indigenous technological base. Due
                  to the country’s extremely positive attitude towards foreign investment and the
                  wide range of attractive incentives to MNCs, Singapore became a favourite
                  site, particularly for U.S. investors. In 1966, foreign direct investment (FDI)

                  in Singapore’s manufacturing sector amounted to $239 million. As a result
                  of aggressive promotion on the part of the Government through a range of

                  tax and investment incentives, the figure increased to $1,575 million in 1971
                                                        3
                  and $6,349 million in 1979 respectively.  By the early 1990s, the East Asian
                  Newly-Industrialising Economies (NIEs) - South Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong
                  and Singapore - had graduated into major exporters of more mature consumer

                  products in microelectronics, computers and telecommunication equipment.
                       The success of Singapore’s EOI strategy in the late 1960s and 1970s was

                  dependent to a large extent on adopting modern science and technology to catch
                  up with the more advanced countries. But the task of closing the technological
                  gap was easier said than done. British colonial rule had not produced the
                  desired development in technical and vocational education.  There was a severe
                                                                       4



                  3   Economic Development Board, Annual Report, 1972 and 1980.
                  4    Goh Chor Boon, Technology and Entrepot Colonialism in Singapore, 1819 – 1940
                     (Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2013), Chapter 8.
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11